We're tanking because the Jazz FO decided to blow up a perennial playoff team. We're not talented enough to win precisely because of this decision made precisely to ensure that we wouldn't have the talent to win and thus would not have another option.
I'm not arguing that we shouldn't maximize the odds of winning the lottery given that we're on this path, this obviously makes sense from an ex-ante strategic perspective. I'm merely saying that once the pingpong balls are drawn, we may end up ruing that we followed this strategy IF the lottery winner is, similar to Atlanta in 2024, a team with lower to significantly lower odds of winning.
This is a purely after-the-fact scenario, but one, if it occurs, there's most definitely the possibility that we wish we had won more games.
It may even be the case that a "bad" Jazz win during the regular season, which pushes us out of the top 3, is precisely what ends up winning us the lottery.
I'm on record saying that IF we're going to tank, we might as well do it "right" to maximize our odds. But, I realize that there are any number of scenarios that, if they occur, maximizing our odds in this way was not, with hindsight, the winning strategy. I don't see that I'm saying anything controversial. Strikes me as eminently reasonable.