How come we don't have a publicly-funded counterpoint to NPR???? Isn't that just some silly abuse of public funds to propagandize the American people???
NPR goes out of its way to present different sides of issue. What would the counterpoint be?
How come we don't have a publicly-funded counterpoint to NPR???? Isn't that just some silly abuse of public funds to propagandize the American people???
This was generally a very good post, but I disagree here. In America, the solution to bad speech is good speech. The solution to bad ideas are good ideas, well-stated and plainly. I agree that no one should be persecuted for their religious belief (or any other sort of belief). However, I think it's possible to call out religious beliefs without it rising to the level of persecution. If I followed TheBlackSwordsman/Stoked/JazzSpazz/PearlWatson/Bronco70/etc. around every thread, calling out their religion in every (or even many) unrelated threads, that would be harassment and persecution. That it happens in the occasional thread means it is not harassment and not persecution.
Since so many others are done with you, can you now find the time to admit Hitler was not revealed to be an atheist by Hitler's Table Talk, and that there is no good reason to say he was and many good reasons to say he was not?
God deniers usually feel the void by becoming Darwiniacs, a major cult of the Liberal religion. It is either that or they turn to booze.
Hitler may have expressed disliked for the Godless soviets but he wholeheartedly embraced the Darwiniac cult, so popular among Germany's "intellectual" class, and it's doctrine of "preserving the favored races."
God deniers and/or Darwiniacs are all one big happy family when it comes to applying the logic of the Darwiniac Dogma that man is simply an accident and has no greater moral significance than the flies that frequent Obongo's purple lips.
God deniers usually feel the void by becoming Darwiniacs, a major cult of the Liberal religion. It is either that or they turn to booze.
Hitler may have expressed disliked for the Godless soviets but he wholeheartedly embraced the Darwiniac cult, so popular among Germany's "intellectual" class, and it's doctrine of "preserving the favored races."
God deniers and/or Darwiniacs are all one big happy family when it comes to applying the logic of the Darwiniac Dogma that man is simply an accident and has no greater moral significance than the flies that frequent Obongo's purple lips.
So what if there isn't a God? Wouldn't it make sense to not pretend there was?
Brace yourself for some stupid lecture about how magnificently complex the human eye is. Then, about how drunk we get in our own skepticism because god gave us will.
It's like 17th century Paris all over again...
If you agree that Carl Sagan, Mark Twain, and Einstein weren't atheists, sure I'll say Hitler wasn't an atheist.
Since so many others are done with you, can you now find the time to admit Hitler was not revealed to be an atheist by Hitler's Table Talk, and that there is no good reason to say he was and many good reasons to say he was not?
Now you know how the religious feel. Works both ways NAOS.
Mark Twain was definitely not an atheist.
Since Carl Sagan and Albert Einstein chose not to identify themselves as atheists, and it would be rude of me to correct them on their own beliefs, I will agree they are not atheists.
Deal!
Carl Sagan, Mark Twain, and Einstein weren't atheists.
Now, it's your turn.