What's new

Coronavirus

Didn't even read it PL. Every single time I give you a chance you lie. Get help. You even pathologically claimed that video wasn't released pl. How could one even formulate such a blatant lie? Even the article the pathological liar posted said it was just being vetted. The liar didn't even read his own article.
 
Last edited:
I thank you for calling me out, among others. I was too narrow-minded, in that I connected "lab leak" with "lab created", and I regret that confusion led to unfair criticism of you and others.
You didn’t criticize me. I didn’t have an opinion either way at that time. I’m still waiting to see. Both theories sound reasonable at the time and the currently do too. I still don’t know the origins. I just post when there is a development or update. Honestly everyone that said it was not from a lab can absolutely still be correct.
 
It was lab created. The Wuhan Institute was factually mutating and using gain of function research to transmit SARS into mice that were mutated with imitation human lungs. Do people really not understand basic 2nd grade probabilities? The chance of this randomly leaking and just being coincidence is absolute zero. Again, I educated you all on this for months.
 
I'd like to clarify something. When I say that seconds after the news of an outbreak broke there were unfounded conspiracies, I'm talking about people wildly speculating literally seconds after the new broke. Not people actually putting in the work to gather actual information.

If you heard news of the outbreak and instantly convinced yourself of a cheesy Hollywood movie plot then it doesn't make you smart or right if down the road some semi-similar version of your unfounded speculation turns out to be true.
That was my point. No one could know where it came from at that time. We knew it came from Wuhan. At that moment could it have came from a Wet Market, sure that makes sense. But there was a Lab that worked on viruses in Wuhan, but a lab leak would not be an origin? The logic is there and both sound plausible. Why did everyone take the Wet Market side at the time? Why was the lab leak not an option and a conspiracy theory?

There is a big difference between that and the Paul Pelosi break in. Gay lovers and other bull **** that made no sense or had a connection. Just right wing twitter personalities spreading ****.
 
Why did everyone take the Wet Market side at the time? Why was the lab leak not an option and a conspiracy theory?
For my part, it's because that's what the people who had expertise were saying was the most likely option. Nobody who actually knew what they were talking about said "it was definitely for this or that" because they're not idiots, and can only go with the most likely scenario.
 
For my part, it's because that's what the people who had expertise were saying was the most likely option. Nobody who actually knew what they were talking about said "it was definitely for this or that" because they're not idiots, and can only go with the most likely scenario.
The people that had expertise were also saying that it came from a lab but Fauci bought them out for 9 million dollars and forced the others to stay silent with bully tactics. Just like you did.

This is all on emails I've already shown here.
 
That was my point. No one could know where it came from at that time. We knew it came from Wuhan. At that moment could it have came from a Wet Market, sure that makes sense. But there was a Lab that worked on viruses in Wuhan, but a lab leak would not be an origin? The logic is there and both sound plausible. Why did everyone take the Wet Market side at the time? Why was the lab leak not an option and a conspiracy theory?

There is a big difference between that and the Paul Pelosi break in. Gay lovers and other bull **** that made no sense or had a connection. Just right wing twitter personalities spreading ****.
Because this was their opportunity to get rid of Trump... If we learned it was a lab leak Democrats couldn't use it to blame Trump as he was the one literally saying it was. Remember... Trump stopped travel from parts ofChina yet Democrats forced him to back track so more Americans would die and make Trump look bad. If they would've not intentially bullied others with hate a fascism, we could've started research much earlier but guys like Fish, Onebrow, Gandalfe, Gameface and especially @Red bullied others to stay silent as they didn't want that.
 
That was my point. No one could know where it came from at that time. We knew it came from Wuhan. At that moment could it have came from a Wet Market, sure that makes sense. But there was a Lab that worked on viruses in Wuhan, but a lab leak would not be an origin? The logic is there and both sound plausible. Why did everyone take the Wet Market side at the time? Why was the lab leak not an option and a conspiracy theory?

There is a big difference between that and the Paul Pelosi break in. Gay lovers and other bull **** that made no sense or had a connection. Just right wing twitter personalities spreading ****.
My point is going to be the same as gandalfe's pretty much. The "authorities" were saying they "believed" that it "may" have come from the wet market. The conspiracy theorists were saying that they knew it was man made and intentionally leaked from the lab.

I'm all for speculation and skepticism. What I really detest is absolute confidence in knowledge that it is impossible to have.
 
For my part, it's because that's what the people who had expertise were saying was the most likely option. Nobody who actually knew what they were talking about said "it was definitely for this or that" because they're not idiots, and can only go with the most likely scenario.

Fauci Hid Damning Emails from CDC, Gave $9M Grant to Scientists After Recanting Lab Leak Theory​



A troll educating you guys.
 
My point is going to be the same as gandalfe's pretty much. The "authorities" were saying they "believed" that it "may" have come from the wet market. The conspiracy theorists were saying that they knew it was man made and intentionally leaked from the lab.

I'm all for speculation and skepticism. What I really detest is absolute confidence in knowledge that it is impossible to have.
There was a lab 700 feet from the market that literally studied SARS that had lax safety measures and doctors sick as early as September. If you couldn't put 1+1 together and thought this was astronomical coincidence, then you are not a very bright. The probabality that this was coincidental is literally zero.
 
The surface area of planet Earth is 196.9 million square miles or 5,489,256,960,000,000 square feet yet people think that a once in over a century virus magically popped up 700 feet. about a tenth of one single mile from a lab that had very lax safety where the only things required were a lab coat and safety glasses. A lab that Fauci was funding to do GoF research on mice to mutate them to have the equivalent of human lungs just to infect them with bats that have the virus. Do people really not understand that a virus of this magnitude popping up 700 feet from a SARS lab with very little safety in an earth that is 5,489,256,960,000,000 is zero percent. That being chance is about as zero percent as zero can get.
 
My point is going to be the same as gandalfe's pretty much. The "authorities" were saying they "believed" that it "may" have come from the wet market. The conspiracy theorists were saying that they knew it was man made and intentionally leaked from the lab.

I'm all for speculation and skepticism. What I really detest is absolute confidence in knowledge that it is impossible to have.
Don't forget that actual scientific analysis of the virus itself confirmed it was natural, and not man-made. It still may have leaked from a lab, but it wasn't a supernatural frankenstein engineered bio-weapon thing.
 
Back
Top