IDC if Bernie couldnt get it done. I know he'd at least try and fight.
Warren taking big corporate money and cozying up to the Clintons? lmao
Go Warren!
- Thread starter Gameface
- Start date
Warren taking big corporate money and cozying up to the Clintons? lmao
Bottom line:
Do you want a technocracy? Vote for Warren.
Do you want a true democracy? Vote for Sanders.
Do you want a technocracy? Vote for Warren.
Do you want a true democracy? Vote for Sanders.
Kudos to @Gameface. This thread has sparked some of the best discussion in GD all off-season.
How do you all feel about the other candidates. Yang seems like a technocratic favorite and I really like Tulsi Gabbard. They don't have a realistic chance, but their ideas are worth discussing.
How do you all feel about the other candidates. Yang seems like a technocratic favorite and I really like Tulsi Gabbard. They don't have a realistic chance, but their ideas are worth discussing.
Last edited:
The Thriller
Well-Known Member
I’ve noticed this too. He’s been killing it lately.
That video and Fox news sound very alike. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with any of the content, but the presenter sounds like any presenter you would see on Fox. I think it's the way they are reading off the prompter like it's an essay?
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
semantics she chooses to leave out?
She’s a lawyer, Zombie. Don’t kid yourself. She’s decidedly vague on her healthcare plan— it’s not an accident.
Just know when she backtracks, that there was signs all along the way
Zombie
Well-Known Member
Fair enough. I do think she needs to be a little more clear on how hard she'd be willing to fight for a single payer Medicare for all plan.
At the debates she seemed pretty insistent that she supported Bernie's plan, but time will tell.
Yes, it’s definitely a different take. I wonder if this primary season could perhaps tear us apart. Not to fear, however, as Trump should single handedly reunite general discussion sometime late next year.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
That depends upon the implementation. LogGrad98 can tell you more about it than I (based on personal experience), but my understanding is that Germany (for example) relies on private (non-profit) administrators for its public healthcare.
candrew
Well-Known Member
candrew
Well-Known Member
This is exactly what I said 2 pages ago. Politicians like Warren tell you how you should think while politicians like Obama and Bill Clinton (and Trump) tell you how you should feel. The former type never gets enough of the left leaning electorate into the voting booths.
This will be 2004 all over again. The left thought they could win on Bush/Cheney hate alone. So they went safe and trotted out John Kerry, an experienced, capable, blow-dried politician with zero relatable qualities.
It sucks and it's wrong and it shouldn't be this way - but the fact is we're in a Reality TV world - that's why we have a Reality TV personality as President - Warren doesn't make the cut.
NAOS
Well-Known Member
I’m not in her camp, but I think you’re numb to the recent tides.
Jazzta
Guest
Tulsi is the anti-military industrial complex candidate by nature, and supports medicare for all, hence the most attractive candidate in my eyes. That can be taken in different ways.
Elegant, presidential, cuts through like a knife. She could take Trump for a ride if given the chance.
candrew
Well-Known Member
I'm not numb to them, l just don't lend much credence to them this early in the game.
NAOS
Well-Known Member
There’s some pretty dependable evidence that she’s already surging; and that she’s the one who will benefit most from a thinning field.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
Gameface, Pls watch
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
you can only opt in on private insurance if you’re making above 60some thousand euros a year; 77% of their health care expenditure is delivered by the public sector, a figure higher than UKs or Canada’s last I checked. Additionally, these sickness funds are all not for profit, which is different from what Buttigieg and Warren are offering.