CNBC is consistently the most upright, honest, and unbiased media outlet in the world. They report to highly intellectual deep pockets who have no place for bias or spin. If you saw their questions as attacking it's most likely that you were offended by them not outright supporting your positions than it was any actual attacks on the candidates.
Your complaints seem to amount to nothing more than a panel challenging your guy(s) with real questions. That's what journalists are supposed to do. Also, who give a rats *** what a crowd full of conservatives boos? They're biased, they're going to boo anything that doesn't sing to their tune, just as you are right now.
Interupting, rude comments, attacks, biased question asking, arguing and not being able to control the debate encompasses far more than asking tough questions. It doesn't matter what their rep is. They were terrible modding this debate.
But terms like "your guy(s)" is intentionally misleading. Screw the Rs.
You're ignoring all that in an attempt to pick a fight. Sad to see you're back to me with your shenanigans. I wont play, enjoy.