To get the Lakers first...Sir... are you hanging out with Dr. Strange and have the ability to evaluate multiple timelines?
Please tell me why we would do that trade if we did not own our pick?
To get the Lakers first...Sir... are you hanging out with Dr. Strange and have the ability to evaluate multiple timelines?
Please tell me why we would do that trade if we did not own our pick?
Yes... I am aware of that... but what if you believed that was a horrible value and "basically a second round pick". Would you be convinced we do that trade? Cuz that's what Steve was spewing the night of the trade.To get the Lakers first...
Steve says a lot of dumb stuffYes... I am aware of that... but what if you believed that was a horrible value and "basically a second round pick". Would you be convinced we do that trade? Cuz that's what Steve was spewing the night of the trade.
The funny thing is, if you're arguing that the trade is only good if it improves our own draft pick this year, then you're essentially agreeing with me that it's otherwise terrible value.Yes... I am aware of that... but what if you believed that was a horrible value and "basically a second round pick". Would you be convinced we do that trade? Cuz that's what Steve was spewing the night of the trade.
I think you just have a different definition of tanking than most people, which is fine.It’s nothing to do with our own pick or not.. it’s whether the move takes us AWAY from making the playoffs or not this year.
Again I would argue that trading away 3 of your starters just as the playoffs race heats up equates to doing just that.
The funny thing is, if you're arguing that the trade is only good if it improves our own draft pick this year, then you're essentially agreeing with me that it's otherwise terrible value.
Why did they make the trade then... what was their thinking?I understand why they made the trade. I just thought it was garbage value.
So it sounds like you don't like the trade either if we ignore the potential benefit it provides to our own pick this year?Not at all. Simply swapping current value for future value. The resulting draft pick improvement is one of the factors. If there was no value in our own pick then I am fairly sure having a young team in the playoffs would have been prioritized over a first.
Primarily, to offload contracts of players not part of their future which opens up cap space for them to make any kind of trade they want.Why did they make the trade then... what was their thinking?
We know exactly what Dok can do: Nothing. We also know what he can't do: Anything.Locke’s reasoning for the Jazz playing Juzang, Dok., was to find out what they could do.. but you just don’t do that if you’re fighting for playoffs spot and guaranteed seeding.
Not to mention that Dok won't even be here next year.We know exactly what Dok can do: Nothing. We also know what he can't do: Anything.
These excuses gotta improve if they really want us to believe them.
So it sounds like you don't like the trade either if we ignore the potential benefit it provides to our own pick this year?
Beasley we could just waive. Vando could be moved into some teams space pretty easily... Mike who knows. I think the value of the deal is the pick first, cap space second, improved lotto odds (potentially) third... might be tied for second.Primarily, to offload contracts of players not part of their future which opens up cap space for them to make any kind of trade they want.
Locke literally mentioned that fact too... He also then was like "what's going on in OKC" because SGA sat with an abdominal strain and Dort/Giddy only played 21 minutes. It was so hypocritical that I lold.Not to mention that Dok won't even be here next year.
Maybe the Cavs will take him and turn him into the Cleveland Finnisher smhNot to mention that Dok won't even be here next year.
Also past Derrick Rose too.Did you know Juzang moved past Westbrook on the all-time Jazz scoring list last night? Truly impressive.
OKC, NO, maybe the Lakers.....we may end in the play-in. Loss against OKC will become mandatory !