What's new
By:

Jazz discussing #3 for #6, #18

BOX said:
But past 5 hes gone. After two everyone is drafting on need. Every teams big board has different bpa as well. Cavs would take knight 4 if they did not take irving 1. Perplexing that taking knight 3 is so hard to understand. I think there are alot of broken hearts on this board as the draft creeps closer as i think it is evident Kanter will not be a jazzman.
Click to expand...

Probably. I've said I'd like to see them draft Kanter but will be pretty happy with Knight. While he may not be the franchise changer at #3 I think his bust potential is quite low, so that's a positive. Plus it's hard to not like the kid. He's an intelligent hard worker who can shoot.
 
Spurs looking to trade Tony Parker to the Raptors or Kings for their draft picks. If the Spurs pull a trade for the 5th Overall Pick. I think it's safe for the Jazz to trade down with the Wizards and get a future 1st round draft pick. Why? Spurs like George Hill and would not draft Kanter as they are trying to get a big/center to replace Duncan
 
utahjazz107 said:
Spurs looking to trade Tony Parker to the Raptors or Kings for their draft picks. If the Spurs pull a trade for the 5th Overall Pick. I think it's safe for the Jazz to trade down with the Wizards and get a future 1st round draft pick. Why? Spurs like George Hill and would not draft Kanter as they are trying to get a big/center to replace Duncan
Click to expand...
Any chance of KOC bugging the Spurs war room to see who they would draft if they're interested in moving to #5? My guess is Valanciunas. San Antonio can afford to have him play in Europe one more year.
 
GlassEater said:
Any chance of KOC bugging the Spurs war room to see who they would draft if they're interested in moving to #5? My guess is Valanciunas. San Antonio can afford to have him play in Europe one more year.
Click to expand...

I think they want Valanciunas and hope he will drop past Cleveland at 4. They could add depth at shooting guard/small forward to replace Manu and Richard Jefferson but they seem set at PG with Hill.
 
NAOS said:
I don't put a lot of stock in this rumor. And, I agree with those of you who have said this isn't enough value returning to the Jazz.
But, sure, if KOC is SURE that Knight is his guy and that he'll fall to #6, then this trade (with a chip or two added) makes obvious sense. But, I don't think KOC is just gonna trade down to see what happens; he'll get his guy.

I'm still confused about why the world hasn't been fed a line about our "love" for Kanter. That would make getting value out of the #3 in a trading down scenario much easier.
Click to expand...

I have stated this numerous times. The Jazz can have this trade in place if they take Kanter and Knight falls to number 6, if not we just keep Kanter. Is that so hard to understand?
 
prodigy said:
#6 - Bismack Biyombo(if ppl think this is a reach - recently i've heard him mentioned to go to Toronto as high as #5, but most realistic would be Detroit at #8)
#12 - Marshon Brooks(best SG in the draft? i think so)
#18 - Kenneth Faried( a millsap clone, he'd definitely be the best value this late)
Click to expand...

We all talk about Knight being a reach at #3. But in this every one of these guys would be a reach were you have them IMO. Yeah Biyombo has been mentioned at 5, but he has also been mentioned at 20. Half of the mocks have him going out of the lottery. So that is definitely a reach IMO. Brooks? Late teens, early 20's is were he is projected so thats a reach again. Faried is close there to his value I think. But I would rather just keep Milsap who is better. So that is a reach because we already have a better version of the guy.

Again JMO Prodigy, I think you are one of the best posters on the board so don't take this like I am attacking you personally
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top