Talking to you is like stepping into quicksand.
I am indeed a vortex of truth and accuracy, sucking down the inaccuracies.
LOL that there are no explosive claims in that video. "They'd rather we not, but we do these selected structure mutations to try to see if we can make them more potent." That's one of many very concerning direct quotes from this Pfizer executive. If one of Trump's accountants said, "We hide income by transferring money to Trump's charities and then allow Donald to use it to operate his helicopters and golf courses," would you tell me that the quote was no big deal and that the public should not demand a full explaination?
I'm fairly sure that your Trump hypothetical is illegal, and also a betrayal of trust given by the donors to those charities. By contrast, experimenting on viruses is legal, and (to the degree that it helps strengthen vaccine preparation) in the public interest.
I asked something like this before: What other businesses do you demand R&D transparency for? What happens to protecting intellectual property and proprietary secrets if we require R&D transparency?
LOL that we should not demand transparency. LOL that there is any reason other than obfuscation for Pfizer to hide the employment status of this individual. LOL that nobody with credibility believes that COVID may have originated in a lab. LOL that Americans have not been forcefully compelled to get vaccinations. LOL that there are no soft on crime DAs who were elected with Soros money. LOL that actual facts have a liberal bias. Again and again supposedly fact checked and debunked versions of stories have turned out to be true, and the error is virtually always on the side of the liberal narrative. Hunter laptop, Jessie Smollette, Nick Sandman, and so many more, Shocking stories disappear from the news cycle because they are literally overwhelmed by the additional shocking stories that follow on their heels.
I'm going to relax and float to the surface now. Peace out, Jazzfanz.
How does Pfizer benefit from confirming/denying the employment status of the interviewee?
Many people with credibility believe it's possible covid originated in a lab, almost no one with credibility believes it's probably or likely.
Name one group of Americans forcibly vaccinated.
There are no soft-on-crime DAs, period. There are some who understand that jailing people for small offenses increases crime overall.
Yes, "facts have a liberal bias" is a common joke, originated by noted conservative Stephen Colbert (the character, not the actor). It's one of those jokes that's an appropriate response to conservatives who complain that fact-checkers don't support them often enough. Fact-checkers would be friendlier to conservatives if they deviated from the facts less often.
If you'd like to compare a list of disproven conservative narratives to disproven liberal narratives, I can match you five-for-one (a particularly amusing and stupid conservative narrative is litter boxes in schools for students who identify as cats). BTW, the Hunter Biden laptop is still in the news, Smollett was convicted (so the story is over), and Sandmann had his case dismissed (so the story is over). That's why the latter two have disappeared from the news.
Float, float on.