What's new

Never Trump

So people are saying the argument against Trump would be the power he obtains with unilateral decisions he can make (souring foreign relations, him nuking someone if that's your belief, etc.) Regarding actually advancing or changing anything, he's up against the house and the senate who dislike him on both sides. Then the media who do not like him. Unless, of course, one would be afraid of the power he could inherit from the precedents set under Obama of the expansion of power of the executive branch that everyone has defended as his right for the past 8 years.

Question: who taps the breaks on a Clinton presidency?
 
So people are saying the argument against Trump would be the power he obtains with unilateral decisions he can make (souring foreign relations, him nuking someone if that's your belief, etc.) Regarding actually advancing or changing anything, he's up against the house and the senate who dislike him on both sides. Then the media who do not like him. Unless, of course, one would be afraid of the power he could inherit from the precedents set under Obama of the expansion of power of the executive branch that everyone has defended as his right for the past 8 years.

Question: who taps the breaks on a Clinton presidency?

This

How stupid is it people actually think he would nuke someone. ****ing retarded.
 
What a bunch of BS! Favs should have been given the ball in the low post every time against that lineup. Instead we have Maack jack up shots? WTF? Mack is not a stud. Favs is. Give him the ****in ball!
 
If more people made arguments like yours then I wouldnt bother defend voting for him at all. I would prefer we pull our heads out of collective asses and just go vote 3rd party. Im just so sick of hearing people like Gamface and Siro actually try to defend Hillary.

This **** is so stupid. If we dont start voting 3rd party it will never happen. We will never get the change we need. We will never fix the problems with our corrupt government. Im tired of hearing lets vote for the lesser of two evils. How about we vote for what we actually want.

+1
 
This

How stupid is it people actually think he would nuke someone. ****ing retarded.

I don't know who has said that. I said hyperbolically that a worst case under trump is someone somewhere drops a nuke. Maybe North Korea or Isis, worst case Russia. But trumps potential for causing real damage is staggeringly higher than Billary's.
 
I mean, is the president, like, even necessary?

The bureaucratic foliage swells menacingly... perhaps a pruning awaits.
 
As a former member of the U.S. military I would gladly serve under President Hillary Clinton.

I would fear for my life and the future of the U.S. if serving under Trump.

Kind of the end of the story for me.

You can call her crooked all you want, she's been under investigation for the last 25 years. She hasn't been caught. That's the mind I want directing my nation. You could have gone after her incompetence, it's there. But you want to tell me how big a liar she is? Well, she might tell her lies, only problem using that as the main strategy against her, she has never been caught in any of them.

Trump is smart not paying taxes? Yeah, that's kiddie stuff. He's soooo smart.

Hillary Clinton has never been caught in any of her lies and she's been public enemy #1 for the Republicans for 25 years. She is a unique level of genius if she's as big a liar as her opponents say she is. She's just the most competent politician in the last century if she isn't a liar.

I'm kind of hoping we luck out and she's actually a liar and thus proves that she's one of the greatest political minds in the history of mankind. We deserve nothing less after having to listen to Trump's campaign.
 
Because the ****ing idiot talks about nuking things.
Why do you believe him when he talked about that, as compared to what I'm assuming are the multitude of things where you don't believe him?

Personally, i just don't believe anything he says. I find it easier that way, and probably more realistic.
 
Back
Top