What's new

Never Trump

Let me just say that I absolutely ignore anything you say about Hillary Clinton. It's a constant mission to prove that she is the dirtiest presidential candidate the world has ever seen. I see in you a culmination of everything the Republicans have been attempting for the last twenty five years (I'm an independent by the way), not to mention Julian Assange's sole purpose in life to drag Clinton's name through the dirt and screw with the most important election in the world. Almost everything you say about her is irrelevant or taken out of context or without knowing the details of the whole situation. If you had any balance at all, your one-sided tirade might actually be more effective.

That wasn't nice at all, good sir.
 
What's your point?
Everybody already #nevertrumps and everybody already #neverhillarys for largely the same reasons.

But thanks for shedding additional light on the we-have-a-****ty-choice-to-make decision before us.
I post here in the Never Trump thread because there are more and better reasons to be against Trump than there are to be against Clinton. Should be pretty easy to understand. Clinton is a flawed candidate but the choice is not even close. Trump would be a much worse president than Clinton. It’s absurd to believe everybody is already never Trump. Trump is running 10 to 15 points ahead of Clinton in Utah and will win Utah’s electoral votes easily unless many more people get more information on Trump.
 
you are not politically correct.

let's be inclusive and have some black ghosts as well, and some Asian ghosts, and some Eskimo ghosts too.

Ghosts are transparent dum dum. Technically speaking those ghosts has black outlines so if any think they ARE black ghosts.
 
That wasn't nice at all, good sir.

Probably right. I believe that most social media platforms and forums are simply a microphone for anyone who wants to say anything they want. It seems that very few people ever change their mind about anything. There is rarely give and take, and almost always the thoughts are just an endless monologue masked in a dialogue.

Nuance is dead, and now, more than ever, it's the age of proving how little words actually matter, as long as one experiences the catharsis of blurting out one's ephemeral whims or taking a picture of the meal they are about to consume and posting it on Instagram. So goes the king of inanity, Trump, as he leads the way on his Twitter account and at whatever venue he has an audience, virtual or not.

I normally don't respond to the majority of comments out there, but sometimes I get caught up in the fantasy that speaking out against anyone's words (catharsis) will actually have any effect on changing that person's mind. It's too easy to not give a **** when you're detached from your words as they fly off to become something else. In Trump's case, they become Frankenstein's monster. I can only hope they haunt him as much as the monster did Dr. Frankenstein. The reason I mention Trump is because he is emblematic of the information fatigue everyone suffers as many slip into a deeper apathy over words, which have lost their apparent power but not their effective power. In "short," I have probably been guilty of most of what I have written in this very post, in this very post.
 
Let me just say that I absolutely ignore anything you say about Hillary Clinton. It's a constant mission to prove that she is the dirtiest presidential candidate the world has ever seen. I see in you a culmination of everything the Republicans have been attempting for the last twenty five years (I'm an independent by the way), not to mention Julian Assange's sole purpose in life to drag Clinton's name through the dirt and screw with the most important election in the world. Almost everything you say about her is irrelevant or taken out of context or without knowing the details of the whole situation. If you had any balance at all, your one-sided tirade might actually be more effective.
Both major parties nominated horrible candidates if we measure them by the standards a reasonable person would use to evaluate the people in their life (honesty, integrity, fairness, consistency, etc.). The fact that you're perfectly fine with the one who claims she didn't know that the "c" beside certain paragraphs in government emails meant that the info was confidential pretty much says it all.

But on a positive note, we are in agreement on Trump. There was a time when I was trying to convince myself to vote for him. For me, a little bit of insider knowledge about the Trump University situation (which is an outright scam) compounded by his comments regarding the Hispanic judge who was assigned to the case were the straw that broke the camel's back.

In my opinion both these candidates are unrepentant power-hungry narcissistic liars. There is no circumstance under which I would ever cast a vote for either one of them.
 
Both major parties nominated horrible candidates if we measure them by the standards a reasonable person would use to evaluate the people in their life (honesty, integrity, fairness, consistency, etc.). The fact that you're perfectly fine with the one who claims she didn't know that the "c" beside certain paragraphs in government emails meant that the info was confidential pretty much says it all.

But on a positive note, we are in agreement on Trump. There was a time when I was trying to convince myself to vote for him. For me, a little bit of insider knowledge about the Trump University situation (which is an outright scam) compounded by his comments regarding the Hispanic judge who was assigned to the case were the straw that broke the camel's back.

In my opinion both these candidates are unrepentant power-hungry narcissistic liars. There is no circumstance under which I would ever cast a vote for either one of them.



I thought our politicians were awful in recent years, but ffs in a country of 300 million these two turkeys are the best you can come up with ???
 
Back
Top