What's new

Roe v. Wade is going down

Sure you can, you can allow it to be born, then put a child up for adoption too.
If I changed another person's body to extant pregnancy does, against their wishes, that would be battery, and probably felony-level battery. Saying the fetus has no intention to harm doesn't reduce the harm.

There’s not a human out there who didn’t start as that bundle of cells. Well…other than those two in the Bible.
They should start with women who are willing to endure permanent bodily alterations for the sake of the children, rather than be forced into them.
 
I think you're being alarmist and taking focus away from the real issues here. What would an investigation into a possible miscarriage/abortion look like? Did that exist before? Is anyone talking about doing that. Would they force the woman to get a medical examination to maybe prove that it was an abortion? Are states abortion restrictions worded in such a way as to establish anything like this?
Might look something like this


View: https://twitter.com/denisew1031/status/1541270002258558977?s=21&t=btwV-AHPTXYcjBCIX8K3cQ


A glimpse into the future perhaps? I’m pretty sure this was a message bill proposed by a Democrat. But how often have we seen in the last few years the absurd become normalized? Like buying Greenland, blackmailing Zelensky, dropping nukes on hurricanes, building walls between us and Mexico, or banning abortion…
 
.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220627-135846.jpg
    Screenshot_20220627-135846.jpg
    116.8 KB · Views: 11
I do not take my moral stances from the Bible nor from reality TV shows. I will not be terminating a pregnancy, either my own or anyone else's, at 32+ weeks (or at any time). However, few abortions are performed in that time frame, and almost always it is because of serious complications to the fetus or the mother. Women who are pregnant at 32+ weeks have already planned for a child and are not getting rid of it for convenience, conservative scare tactics notwithstanding. I believe that women and doctors should make health care decisions and not politicians. So no, I am not a monster. Neither are the women or the doctors involved.
 
I do not take my moral stances from the Bible nor from reality TV shows. I will not be terminating a pregnancy, either my own or anyone else's, at 32+ weeks (or at any time). However, few abortions are performed in that time frame, and almost always it is because of serious complications to the fetus or the mother. Women who are pregnant at 32+ weeks have already planned for a child and are not getting rid of it for convenience, conservative scare tactics notwithstanding. I believe that women and doctors should make health care decisions and not politicians. So no, I am not a monster. Neither are the women or the doctors involved.
Well said.
 
Anti-abortion protester tried to murder police officer using a flame thrower at a Roe v. Wade protest.

Attempted murder for little spurt of flame from a can of hairspray?

Lmao, I'm certain I've put my friends (and myself) in more danger having roman candle wars as teenagers. Cops are even bigger crybabies than I thought.
 
Last edited:
Attempted murder for little spurt of flame from a can of hairspray?

Lmao, I'm certain I've put my friends (and myself) in more danger having roman candle wars as teenagers. Cops are even bigger crybabies than I thought.

The can of hair spray trick? I remember doing that in my house when i was like 12.
That is what Al was talking about when he said flame throwe? Lol. I pictured an actual flame thrower when he said flame thrower.

I should have known better.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
 
What would happen if all the women against this BS decided to strike? Like not go to work. A walkout of epic proportions. Good idea or terrible idea?
 
Back
Top