Nope, just saying they did.
They did say they wanted to fabricate a relationship between trump and Russia...According to CIA Director Brennan. Page 81.
Involved in a strategy to make up a scandal is, with the heads of the FBI, CIA, POTUS and VP. They all knew it was false yet still ran with it. It's a little more than a campaign strategy.
Thoroughly discredited? From whom? An opinion, from January? This just came out a couple hours ago.
Nothing there says that any of them knew it was false. It does say that the Intelligence Community does not know the accuracy of the allegation or the extent to which it may reflect exaggeration or fabrication.
Exactly, yet you are fine with them creating this hoax because it's Trump and they want Clinton to win. Why did it move forward, even though they new it was a hoax, less than 30 days later? They could have shut the whole hoax down, but they didn't. Then you have loud mouth news personalities spreading disinformation and the partisan consumption citizens parroting everything they say.
This goes beyond the Clinton Campaign.
I'm partially with some of this, but this is a whole different conversation.
www.pbs.org
It has not been shown to be a hoax. It has been shown to have been unclear at the time.
According to the Durham report, they were more enthusiastic at pursuing leads than they should have been. They do know that. Not that it matters, once the spotlight is off for a while, they'll continue in these sorts of behaviors, because that's what law enforcement officials do; they get aggressive and break rules to catch lawbreakers.
I think they didn't shut it down because they were finding evidence of crimes.
The document says that Brennan briefed his superiors on Clinton's approval, not that he nor anyone else knew it was fabricated nor approved of a fabrication.
The Durham report makes no such claims.
I agree that the report, while demanding a level of rigor not usually seen at the FBI, is in no way discreditied.
The Mueller report was very clear that Trump/Russia collusion happened.
Did what, precisely? Get informed by subordinates of a campaign strategy?
Clinton created the story, not the FBI nor the administration, and it turned out not to be a hoax.
Not according to the material you presented, and not that I found in Durham's report..
I don't see that saying "fabricate" or "make up." It says "stir up" which, from my experience cooking chili, don't mean the same thing It would mean more bringing it to the top.
www.rollingstone.com
Oh you mean the crimes that had nothing to do with the actual investigation?
