NAOS
Well-Known Member
Niang is absolutely fine as a 9th or 10th man. In this capacity, he would help any team make it through the regular season in better shape. The only problems I have with Niang are
(a) when he’s asked to do more than this role suggests (playoff rotations are often trimmed to 8)
and
(b) the fact that he’s about to be paid more than a 9th or 10th player on a tax-paying team should be. (Unless you’re one of the fortunate few who have no ceiling as far as willingness to pay tax is concerned).
(a) when he’s asked to do more than this role suggests (playoff rotations are often trimmed to 8)
and
(b) the fact that he’s about to be paid more than a 9th or 10th player on a tax-paying team should be. (Unless you’re one of the fortunate few who have no ceiling as far as willingness to pay tax is concerned).