The official "let's impeach Trump" thread
- Thread starter colton
- Start date
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
So you don’t watch tv shows with former employees (The Mooch) that are going to be critical of you by accident?
Hey, if POTUS has time to tweet 24X7, then I have time to mess with you. I work 60 hours a week, I need some down time and entertainment!
Now you are going to pretend that the socialist comment was not directed at me? Your credibility is calling you, it is lost and lonely. It wants you back.
I have no idea what beef you are referring to.
You must be blind. Or living in Wonderland. What I and millions of others see is a person who cares LESS about others than literally any other public figure I have ever known.
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
I’m unsure where to post this... so I’ll just leave this here:
https://abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/texas-women-plastic-surgery-ivanka-trump/story?id=43258425
https://abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/texas-women-plastic-surgery-ivanka-trump/story?id=43258425
You have been corrected on this point SEVERAL times and even admitted that Uranium One DID NOT TRANSFER URANIUM ORE TO RUSSIA.
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obama-era-russian-uranium-one-deal-what-to-know
Yet you lie about it over and over and over.
The problem with the Uranium One deal was not that Uranium went to Russia, because it didn't, it is if Hillary got kickbacks for letting a Russian mining company pull the Uranium out of the ground for us.
Last edited:
I think, if you will don your reading glasses and check your facts here, I said the deal transferred Uranium to a Russian(meaning Russian-controled) company. You think this is an important distinction, about whether it was for refined or enriched Uranium to be shipped to Russia. I don't. The point is, Hillary is no novice at payola, and there is a bit of trail between the deal and her pay for letting it happen. If we investigated that, it would not turn out to be anything but her profiting( in the name of her foundation or whatever, which she is free to use in campaining for office. Yet none of our federal agencies involved in the Trump spygate deal were willing to investigate this.
So here is the line in the post you are objecting to.
"Russia got a lot of US uranium from the deal Hillary approved after taking a ton of cash from the Russkies."
You are wrong, entirely, in what you said about it.
So I know about the claims sold, mostly in the Colorado Plateau area of Northern Arizona and Southern Utah, mostly pretty deep and hard to develop. I might think we sold the Russkies a pig in a poke, but we did sell them the claims.
I actually considered, once, getting a job with Rossatom. They are the leading developer of nuclear power plants today. It is pretty certain that we will be building nuclear power plants pretty soon, too. But the deal gives the Russians a lot of competitive advantage. They don't need to ship it offshore when their plan is for nuclear power plants, but it's also dead certain they could apply for a permit to ship it anywhere for nuclear power use, and get approval from a new set of American government officials, for a little personal financial consideration, as the precedent has been set.
I don't think there is a future military use for nuclear bombs. Well, not for missile=launched bombs anyway. Everybody is working on space-based defenses that can blow up a rocket during launch and just make you look damn silly for trying it.
A few pages back, you gave some links to the raids on some food processing plants where a bunch of workers were detained. E-verify violation or something like that for the owners, and some workers detained for illegal status. About half had work permits pending their hearings on Amnesty other legal petitions, and were released.
Imo opinion, there has been so little enforcement of our laws it's like almost anywhere we start trying to enforce the law, we're just gonna be called brutes or worse. Still, I think it is what we should do, and anyone like yourself who thinks this is something to complain about, or criticize Trump about, has a "beef" that is actually worthless.
I think I intended to include Trumps own use of illegal workers in the past, and I think he did. In the hotel and hospitatity industry, everyone does, I think, even the Marriotts. I use hotels and motels a lot, and I don't care to complain about it. But the law is the law. Good if Trump starts to set a different example and starts to let it out that others will need to do so as well. I'll pay another thirty bu cks for my room. But it has to be applied evenly and not give anyone a sudden advantage.
I hope Trump will do this.