I remember when we took some of mexico for the US. Im sure we would all be cool if mexico invaded the US to take back texas or some ****.
I was thinking the same thing.
I remember when we took some of mexico for the US. Im sure we would all be cool if mexico invaded the US to take back texas or some ****.
Would Ukraine fight our war though? The answer is no. We are funding a majority of Ukraine's war. Would they send us tanks? No. 100 billion? No. Would they put American flags on their profiles? No.
You know why? Because it's not their war.
Sure... I'm not sure where you're coming from though.
"Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) monitors, detailing explosions in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions on February 18 and February 19-20, clearly suggest the contrary. Those big red splotches on the map around Donetsk and Luhansk show an intense bombardment. Overall, there were over 1400 shell and mortar detonations on February 18, about 2,000 explosions over the next two days. From the two maps, it looks like about two-thirds to three-fourths were on the Russian side of the line. This level of activity marks a big change. In early February, the previous thirty-day average was around sixty explosions per day."
Is this data wrong? Looks to me that both sides wanted action.
![]()
Will Tensions in Ukraine Boil Over?
The Ukrainian escalations of the last week, together with Russia’s recognition of the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics and its movement of forces into their territories, advance the conflict to a new level. Vladimir Putin’s decision to recognize the independence of the Donetsk (DPR) and...nationalinterest.org
Welcome to the club that just results to insults. I say the same thing for you. What have you added? Nothing. All you've added is telling me how much more you know without actually adding anything. That's fine. I didn't search you out. I asked you a simple question 2 times now. What is the end game here? Where does us sending hundreds of billions end? If this war goes on for 3+ years who's funding this? Not Ukraine... Not NATO. We are. We are in another needless war. For what exactly? A country that has been unstable for decades. A country that has a lot of bad entities to it.So you're mistaking an opinion/interpretation article for a news article.
All of the pieces that you're using to draw a conclusion that Ukraine wanted to start a war are based on the author's subjective assessment of a map contained a report and then an assumption made about what that assessment means about the parties actions and intentions.
Do you know who didn't draw any of those conclusions? The OSCE. Go read the report yourself.
I'm going to try and say this bluntly but I don't mean this to be insulting - this is my honest assessment: you don't have enough background information to know when you're reading something that's designed to manipulate you on this topic. You are drawing conclusions but can't actually assess the quality of the information you're reading. That's a dangerous place to be. Dunning-Kruger is real man.
Agree...That's a dangerous place to be. Dunning-Kruger is real man.
So we should fight every war that has a dictator? Brilliant logic bully. Why arent we fighting other wars with dictators if it's that amazingly simple? Lol brillian logic then you even offer your 2 year old triggered name calling.I see isolationism and appeasement is alive and well. When should the west stand up against dictatorships? Maybe when Putin invades Poland? or do we forget the Poles? Maybe after he invades Germany?
Its not like Putin has been doing his level best to undermine the political process in democratic countries? Or killing dissidents living in western democracies? Oh wait...
You twit.
Here I'll give you a piece from the same days that you wouldn't find on your own.Welcome to the club that just results to insults. I say the same thing for you. What have you added? Nothing. All you've added is telling me how much more you know without actually adding anything. That's fine. I didn't search you out.
Historically the cost to stop imperial powers bent on conquest continually increases with every act of violence that is not stopped.So we should fight every war that has a dictator? Brilliant logic bully. Why arent we fighting other wars with dictators if it's that amazingly simple? Lol brillian logic then you even offer your 2 year old triggered name calling.
You're making way too much out of so little. I was simply pointing out that Ukraine is no saint in this and they also helped initiate this. I stand by that. Russia is the true bad guy here but Ukraine is nowhere near worth this trouble with their checkered past.Here I'll give you a piece from the same days that you wouldn't find on your own.
Welcome to Meduza - the best non-state owned newspaper that reports on Russia and Russian affairs. They publish some of their content in English.
So the same days of increased shelling that you cited to, the 18th and 19th of February, correspond with evacuation announcements by the nominal leaders of the LNR and DNR. That's the "evidentiary record" cited by the Russian side - that Ukraine escalated the situation to the point that evacuations had to be ordered so Russia had to intervene. Russian news repeats this story every day.
So there's a problem with the story: the evacuation announcements were recorded before the Ukrainians supposedly increased shelling on that side of the line.
![]()
Metadata reveals that DNR and LNR leaders recorded evacuation announcements two days in advance — Meduza
The video addresses announcing mass evacuations shared on February 18 by the leaders of the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk “people’s republics” were actually recorded on February 16. This was reported by Bellingcat’s training and research director Aric Toler, who verified video metadata...meduza.io
The video metadata shows the evacuations were recorded on the 16th. The next two days shellings increase. Then the videos are released as a "response" to the shellings. That's the timeline.
Do you still believe that you can just look at the OSCE map, guesstimate the share of who fired what, and then say "both sides are guitly?"
Do you think we are closer to a full out WW3 with helping or without? I say us helping is only making matters worse. We are much closer to an all out Nuclear war than we were a year ago. Hell we now for the first time in nearly 5 decades have no Nuclear treaties with Russia. One country compared to an entire globe. You all are playing a very dangerous game.Historically the cost to stop imperial powers bent on conquest continually increases with every act of violence that is not stopped.
The piece you're not dealing with is that the war in Ukraine will not stop in Ukraine if we abandon it. Moldova's government has already indicated Russia intends to take Moldova next. Russia has signaled an intent to take Estonia as well. The Russian demand regarding NATO was always to give Russia eastern Europe as part of its sphere of influence. That would include portions of the EU like Poland. Maybe eastern Germany.
The line in Russia, right now, is that Russia has no borders. It goes on forever. (source: in Russian https://meduza.io/feature/2023/02/2...a-ofitsialno-rossiya-nigde-ne-zakanchivaetsya) There's really no limiting principle to the Kremlin concepts that led to this war. This is the right war. It's a just war. And Ukraine has to win it. The alternative is all out warfare where borders are negotiable - a return to the 19th century reality. That's the truth of the situation, and you can't negotiate with Putin to only take "just a little" and be satisfied. P