What's new

Thread for responding to transphobic comments

I didn't stick up for anyone, I asked to you to defend your position and think carefully.
That grown men literally flashing their penises in front of little kids is wrong? The fact that I even have to defend this is absolutely disgusting and legitimately scary as hell. This is public not a locker room. This is men showing their penises to kids for fun, not to change clothes in a secluded area. My hell, that fact that i even have to explain that is absolutely mind boggling. How amazingly dumb of a point.
 
Last edited:
That grown men literally practicing voyeurism in front of little kids is wrong?
A voyeur is someone who looks at private behavior. Not happening here.

This is public not a locker room. This is men showing their penises to kids for fun, not to change clothes.
So the objection is not the the view, but the location of the view. That's an arbitrary standard (not to say it's wrong or right, just arbitrary). I don't understand the need to ride a bicycle nude, but I also don't see how it corrupts or scars kids.
 
A voyeur is someone who looks at private behavior. Not happening here.


So the objection is not the the view, but the location of the view. That's an arbitrary standard (not to say it's wrong or right, just arbitrary). I don't understand the need to ride a bicycle nude, but I also don't see how it corrupts or scars kids.
The normilazation is getting bolder and bolder. Again.. It's no wonder the true culprits want me dead. Flashing kids your penis is now normal to these people. It's completely acceptable.

They even admit they are coming for kids... Thier words... Not mine... Not John Stocktons who you guys hate because you are extremely hateful and intolerant.. Thiers................

Public Indecency Law​

“Public indecency” generally refers to acts involving nudity or sexual activity in view of the public, often with the intent to shock, offend, or arouse. It includes criminal offenses like indecent exposure and lewd conduct. Some states use the term “public indecency” to refer to other offenses relating to public nudity, including the display or promotion of obscene materials. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the right of states to outlaw public nudity, holding that the state has an interest in “protecting societal order and morality,” and that public nudity is not “free expression” protected by the First Amendment. Barnes v. Glen Theatre, 501 U.S. 560, 568 (1991). Sexual activity in public is illegal throughout the U.S., but states and localities differ on what constitutes illegal public nudity, both in terms of what body parts are considered “indecent” and whether that state must prove that a defendant had a particular intent.
 
Last edited:
The normilazation is getting bolder and bolder. Again.. It's no wonder the true culprits want me dead. Flashing kids your penis is now normal to these people.
It's not flashing if you are just nude.

They even admit they are coming for kids... Thier words... Not mine...
They are making fun of your words.

but states and localities differ on what constitutes illegal public nudity, both in terms of what body parts are considered “indecent” and whether that state must prove that a defendant had a particular intent.
So, you don't know if the nude cyclists were breaking the law or not.
 
The line "Some of these anti-trans laws are so specific they might as well call it the 'Make Zoey Sad act'" killed me.
I liked the "The trans community is so small it's like if half the country woke up one day and said 'F*** people born in the second half of 1983!'" (It was after the sponsored bit, so it wouldn't surprise me if people missed it.)
 
@One Brow I may be gone soon but this is the type of **** I am talking about.
You have latched on to one story from one news source (a source you absolutely would not trust when talking about, say, Trump's relationship to Russia), one known to be anti-trans.

Kids need to grow and learn, not be pushed full of life altering drugs especially without proper guidance(really shouldn't at all but this is bad).
None of these children were pushed by staff at the WUSTL, they and their parents brought them there.

At least the Doctors made hella money.
The doctors at the clinic do not have a profit-sharing arrangement. They have a salary. They don't get paid more for an increased number of treatments.

Speaking with patients, employees, local health-care providers, and parents, the Times investigation corroborated many of Reed’s central allegations, most notably that a substantial number of adolescent patients were prescribed testosterone treatments before their underlying mental-health issues were addressed. Moreover, the St. Louis clinic exhibited a categoric lack of record-keeping and patient tracking.

As “demand rose, more patients arrived with complex mental health issues. The clinic’s staff often grappled with how best to help, documents show, bringing into sharp relief a tension in the field over whether some children’s gender distress is the root cause of their mental health problems, or possibly a transient consequence of them,” the Times noted.

With its psychologists overbooked, the clinic relied on external therapists, some with little experience in gender issues, to evaluate the young patients’ readiness for hormonal medications. Doctors prescribed hormones to patients who had obtained such approvals, even adolescents whose medical histories raised red flags. Some of these patients later stopped identifying as transgender, and received little to no support from the clinic after doing so.”
Should doctors have refused medical care to patients? Refused to take referrals from young doctors (who all have "little experience")? Continue to treat patients who no longer identified as transgender?

If I described to you a sports injury clinic that was being overrun with high-school athletes, and refused to take referrals from other doctors or brought in patients after they had healed for no good reason or refused to put broken bones in casts, you would be outraged at the refusal to treat these children. The only reason this is different for you is because you are opposed to children transitioning, while you are in favor of setting broken bones. That is transphobia.
 
Back
Top