KD to the Warriors means the whole league is ****ed. Thank you captain obvious.
I don't pull punches. try again.Must've picked that up from you.
KD to the Warriors means the whole league is ****ed. Thank you captain obvious.
You're welcome Chicken Little.
The league isn't ****ed, just for a finite amount of time, I probably understand that more than most everyone here, which is why this thread has gotten the responses it has..
the move is to prepare for when these power teams start to age.
Father time is the only one undefeated in sports, my point is the JAzz should be angling to capitalize on when these teams age rather than to go and face them head on while woefully undermanned.
This is flawed at its base as there will always be super teams. It's called history.
You're welcome Chicken Little.
The league isn't ****ed, just for a finite amount of time, I probably understand that more than most everyone here, which is why this thread has gotten the responses it has..
the move is to prepare for when these power teams start to age.
Father time is the only one undefeated in sports, my point is the JAzz should be angling to capitalize on when these teams age rather than to go and face them head on while woefully undermanned.
I don't pull punches. try again.
What else would you call all those deleted posts in the HB thread?
Um....Utah did stay young. Their title hopes lay in Exum and Gobert and Hayward. They are still here. If everything goes the Jazz way, Hill and JJ will be bench guys come the playoffs.
Not very good because none of AJ, Millsap, Favors and Gobert wanted to be bench players. Outside of that, Jazz couldn't have afforded all of them + Hayward. When the decision to keep two (Favors and Kanter) was made, no one knew the cap would spike. In hindsight, perhaps keeping Millsap over Favors would have been the better choice. But Millsap is aging. So the idea was to have our entire core mature together.How good would this team be with AJ Sap Gobert older Favors an Hayward Hill and JJ? I take that over everything we have today an I would not have to watched losing seasons for no reason.
I disagree with everything you have written here.
So let's just agree to disagree.
Peace.
So here's a question. Little bit off topic.
If 100% of your posts are made purely to bitch about the Jazz, why even bother following them, let alone post about them all the time?
Do you agree that a team like the Timberwolves is more set up to win 10 years from now than the Jazz?
My point is about a long-term outlook like that.
This is flawed at its base as there will always be super teams. It's called history.
The super teams arent stacked like they are these days, whens the last time a 73 win team signed a 1st ballot hof'er??
The Jazz have chosen to bang their heads into a brick wall instead of take a step back and operate from a truly long-term outlook. People here just don't want to hear that I was right about anything, even if it was a shot I've been calling for literally years.
Do you agree that a team like the Timberwolves is more set up to win 10 years from now than the Jazz?
My point is about a long-term outlook like that.