What's new
By:
Filters

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

The Thriller said:
I’m not sure if there are any Democrats when support “no limitations” abortion.

All the Democratic candidates I know of support maintaining the status quo, which is maintaining Roe v Wade. Roe v Wade certainly keeps limitations on abortion. So do you believe Roe v Wade should be overturned and restrictions increased? If so, which restrictions should be placed?

I didn’t check all candidates, so I picked out the two most liberal frontrunners to see what they are advocating for. Warren and Sanders aren’t promoting no limitations abortion. They are however, advocating for universal health care and greater access to education and contraception. But one are advocating for massive reforms to abortion law. Are there candidates in this election more liberal than they? Or am I just misreading their websites?

https://elizabethwarren.com/plans/protect-womens-choices

https://berniesanders.com/issues/womens-rights/

I know after several states passed restrictive anti-abortion laws earlier this year (clearly trying to overturn Roe) there was a backlash from the left. But I’m unaware of any of the presidential candidates going full “woke” and advocating for abortion to be limitless.
Click to expand...

Here's a summary of positions, last updated 4 weeks ago so some of the candidates have dropped out since then: https://www.politico.com/2020-elect...he-issues/health-care/abortion-contraception/

12 candidates fall into the "few limits, if any" category.

4 candidates fall into the "some limits" category, Amy Klobuchar, Joe Biden, Joe Sestak, and Marianne Williamson. People in this category believe that under some conditions abortions in the last trimester should not be permitted. "During a Fox News town hall, Sen. Amy Klobuchar said "there are limits there in the third trimester that are very important — about — except for the health of the woman.” "

That means that with regards to the "few limits, if any" category, 12 of the Democratic candidates apparently think that there should be essentially no limitations on abortions in the third trimester. That's horrible, truly horrible. In the third trimester we're talking about fetuses which are 26-27 weeks along--babies, who if born have a 90% survival rate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_viability

Another quote from a "some limits" candidate, this one from Joe Sestak: "In those very rare cases when a woman seeks to abort a healthy fetus that would likely survive outside the womb, it is reasonable to prohibit such an abortion, as long as there are no threats to the life or health of the woman." That is probably about the LEAST restrictive view on abortion that I could possibly ever support.
 
So one (except Rudy) implemented Trump's directions on Ukraine, most ignored him.

And therefore his attempt to extort the Ukrainians to investigate Biden failed

This guy is such a loser.

Kids: be a terrible leader and fail in your endeavors and you, too, can be like Trump.
 
Nunes is not an American. He should go to jail for covering for Trump. Schiff is sitting right next to him with steam coming out of his ears.
 
Sondland does not have access to his own e-mails, phone records, etc. Colossal cover up by State Department and White House.
 
str8line said:
All other bombshell testimonies pale in comparison to this. Sondland will be remembered as the guy who took down Trump.
Click to expand...

Yeah dude. I feel like he just sink their battleship.

"Was there quid pro quo? Yes."

And the longer story about trying to break the hold on aid, and being told a strong message about investigation publicly would help. And the dirty Giuliani ****, and him making moves without telling the ambassador office.

I did not expect this level of boom when I woke up this morning. I half expect him to give a mic drop at the end of this
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top