Zombie
Well-Known Member
I disagree, from what I've seen the problems in the models were not based on mistakes surrounding the infectiousness or deadliness of the virus, but about how quickly and thoroughly social distancing would slow it down. Once we got data from the steps taken in Europe the models were updated to give a more accurate picture of how well we can expect such measures to work.Yes agreed, would for sure be higher, but I do not believe for one second we'd hit anywhere close to the projections unless we went back to the stone ages, and a majority of the population we weren't able to work from home, wash their hands, use hand sanitizer, obtain face masks etc ..... I think it seems borderline fact that COVID is no where near as dangerous as everyone first thought.
But even if you take 700k as the worst it would possibly have gotten, that's an incredible toll on human life.