Then get the guns out of the hands of the people. Or if it can't be done overnight, start now so it happens 30 years from now.
Since WWII came to its close, and the UN was rolled out to keep the peace, it has been the quite openly stated design that the ordinary people should not have guns, and that nations would more or less reduce arms as well, until only by agreement with the ruling lights of the UN should any nation have any arms, and all that with the unstated but obvious intention that the UN would have all the guns that mattered, and there could be no means to change that government.
The UN is a world model of Fascism. It is not going to allow or permit any kind of Utopian world where there are no borders or no police. Might not call them "borders" but certainly there will be administrative subdivisions and law enforcement no end, for the convenience of management. The government will have all the guns deemed useful for the purpose of suppression of the common man, for the ease and benefit of the few people who really do matter.
The only reason there is any liberty in this world rests in the people's access to the means or power to keep it.
Liberty, the various rights to act, speak, believe and associate which are innate to the human spirit, to the human intelligence... quite distinct from most other species, and generally unmatched....is actually the only sound set of principles by which any kind of peace or prosperity can be achieved, and limiting or constraining the arrogance of power most often associated with governments is perhaps the highest possible use of human intelligence or art. Governments should only exist at the pleasure and benefit of the governed. Period.
We are not cattle, nor sheep, for the slaughter so a few bigots can dine in splendor. Governments are good only so far as they serve some realistic and general need recognized by the people who create governments, fight and die for governments, and pay in any way for the support of governments.
The idle speculation that if people don't have guns there will be no killing or whatever defies all sound judgment. Now, maybe if our governments had no guns it would almost work out for the better. But the reason we wish governments to have guns is that without them, we would be defenseless and over run as a matter of course. And one of the reasons people should have their own guns is to assist in that need, as well as whatever immediate needs we can be respected in meeting. Lawful uses which do not offend others in their rights.
The British have long mastered the arts of management, and may well be regarded even today as disproportionately influential...... and heavily involved in population reductions around the world whether via wars or plagues or poverty or pandemics. America is just the little servant boy put out to take the blame. yah we won a war or two, but we're fools for being charmed outta our good sense by the Brits, and fighting for them better than they can fight for themselves. Now, the order of the day is population reduction, thinning the herd, eliminating annoyances one way or another. Marxism was never anything more than an artful ruse for misdirecting the human hopes and dreams away from actual liberty. It was a necessary ploy, no doubt, to keep the American exceptionalism from spreading around the world, and ultimately forcing British gentry to hitch their own donkeys to their plows and work like men must.
Having elites in this world is a luxury the common folk can not really afford. You thinking you will just smile and talk us out of our guns is insane. Well, we've fallen for it long enough, and pretty much it's gonna be a new day because the schtick is just old and stale.
guns sales are through the roof. Riots won't slow that down.
