What's new
By:
Filters

Hayward getting extension???

Stoked said:
I'd rather go off his career averages of 45% fg, 40% 3pt and 81% ft then 1 crappy preseason. But to each their own i guess.
Click to expand...

He is asked to play different role and so far he is struggling ( it is easier for him to make spot up jumpers then create for himself - thus such a dip in FG so far).. I doubt he will ever be "the man" thus I don't think 13+mil is justified by any numbers. Give him 10mil and call it a day.
 
AKMVP said:


He is asked to play different role and so far he is struggling ( it is easier for him to make spot up jumpers then create for himself - thus such a dip in FG so far).. I doubt he will ever be "the man" thus I don't think 13+mil is justified by any numbers. Give him 10mil and call it a day.
Click to expand...

You've wasted a lot of time today.

BTW, I have a source who says the deal is for 8 million per year. You wanna write another string of stupid posts with this excellent information? I'll be waiting.
 
AKMVP said:


He is asked to play different role and so far he is struggling ( it is easier for him to make spot up jumpers then create for himself - thus such a dip in FG so far).. I doubt he will ever be "the man" thus I don't think 13+mil is justified by any numbers. Give him 10mil and call it a day.
Click to expand...

I'm fine with that. Just trying to base his worth off of one preseason is foolish.
 
Mods I suggest the thread title be changed to "Hayward getting extension???"

At least until something is final.
 
Doublea said:
My gosh I think everyone needs to calm down and wait for an official deal is made. Everybody is making assumptions and going freakin crazy here.

Now I think Hayward is a special player and could be replaced, but we would miss certain parts of his game.
Click to expand...

You always saythe most awesome things. Brings me back.....
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];679077 said:
You've wasted a lot of time today.

BTW, I have a source who says the deal is for 8 million per year. You wanna write another string of stupid posts with this excellent information? I'll be waiting.
Click to expand...

You wont have to wait long for more stupid from this cat.
 
I don't see how it could be a richer deal than Favors. I think Lindsay is smarter than offering Hayward a max deal and I think favors would command more on the open market than Hayward would, as agile, rim protectors that can play the 4 or 5 with some offense are very rare. Maybe the richer part comes from a year longer, like a 5yr/ $50m with the fifth year being a player option.
 
Ben10 said:
For his size and position his ball handling is above average. Is it PG good, no.
Click to expand...

I don't know. Maybe I just see all the times he tries to take someone off the dribble or use the pick and roll and having it get stripped or him losing the handle and it discourages me.
 
Jeffrey32 said:
I don't see how it could be a richer deal than Favors. I think Lindsay is smarter than offering Hayward a max deal and I think favors would command more on the open market than Hayward would, as agile, rim protectors that can play the 4 or 5 with some offense are very rare. Maybe the richer part comes from a year longer, like a 5yr/ $50m with the fifth year being a player option.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure someone said it has to be max to be a five year deal. Amirite?
 
IMO Hayward's handles are only at times bad since we've at times forced him into being the primary ball handler. When we have a PG who can dominate and distribute the ball (hopefully it can be Burke) I think we'll all be very pleased with Hayward's handles.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top