I'd rather go off his career averages of 45% fg, 40% 3pt and 81% ft then 1 crappy preseason. But to each their own i guess.
He is asked to play different role and so far he is struggling ( it is easier for him to make spot up jumpers then create for himself - thus such a dip in FG so far).. I doubt he will ever be "the man" thus I don't think 13+mil is justified by any numbers. Give him 10mil and call it a day.
He is asked to play different role and so far he is struggling ( it is easier for him to make spot up jumpers then create for himself - thus such a dip in FG so far).. I doubt he will ever be "the man" thus I don't think 13+mil is justified by any numbers. Give him 10mil and call it a day.
Vomit. I like Hayward a lot but he will always be limited by his ball-handling and I don't see him as a near max player which is what that extension is.
Mods I suggest the thread title be changed to "Hayward getting extension???"
At least until something is final.
My gosh I think everyone needs to calm down and wait for an official deal is made. Everybody is making assumptions and going freakin crazy here.
Now I think Hayward is a special player and could be replaced, but we would miss certain parts of his game.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];679077 said:You've wasted a lot of time today.
BTW, I have a source who says the deal is for 8 million per year. You wanna write another string of stupid posts with this excellent information? I'll be waiting.
You always saythe most awesome things. Brings me back.....