What's new

Could Kanter and Gobert have worked?

Kanter wanted to go. It is important to keep that part of the story alive, because it is the reason he is gone. It wasn't just that he had a bad day and let it slip out that he wanted a trade. The jazz and Enes had a rocky start and a bumpy relationship and it wasn't improving. It wasn't a big secret either. I heard Lindsey, Locke, and Checketts all say as much with carefully chosen words.

Enes will put up good to great numbers for many years. He will probably jump around to several teams. He might be an All star. Rather than grumbling about our jazz each time, remember that Enes Kanter didn't want to be here.

Too easy to say this just now...he had understandable reasons to not want to be here.

Jazz failed with his development and played cheap with him trying to hide his strong points and exposing his shortcomings in order to resign him at low price. They didn't put him in the ideal conditions to play his best basketball.

Jazz plans with Kanter were not clear and as I said different times they never gave him total trust and respect. Look at Exum rookie season, he is playing poorly almost all season but he is still in the starting lineup and nobody of the management has complained publicly of his poor performances and he is getting unlimited trust.
Kanter on the other hand spent his first two seasons sleeping on the bench. You don't draft a player at the third overall pick and treat him like a scrub.

Lindsey implying that Kanter didn't want to stay here, he is just covering his a** with the Jazz fans if Kanter will be successful with another team.

Anyway the trade has been the right thing for both...but the Jazz underselled him heavily.

Next time the Jazz will manage better a similar situation.
 
Jazz failed with his development and played cheap with him trying to hide his strong points and exposing his shortcomings in order to resign him at low price. .

Wow... this is pure speculation. The Jazz expected Kanter to play defense, just like anyone else on the squad. If that is exposing his shortcomings to the point he asked for a trade then I am glad he left.

The Thunder will be bounced in the first round, and Kanter's pick and roll defense will be a large reason as to why. Playoff basketball will expose Kanter's pick and roll defense much more than the Jazz's "misuse" ever did.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsCWmSsLugk

Man Kanter went off last night.


With 0 assists, 0 blocks, and 1 steal, while the entire Miami defense was focused on Westbrook.

Pretty sure Doctor Peekbro could get to 27 playing in those conditions.
 
With 0 assists, 0 blocks, and 1 steal, while the entire Miami defense was focused on Westbrook.

Pretty sure Doctor Peekbro could get to 27 playing in those conditions.

Very valid points. Which is why the trade worked for both ends. The Thunder can cover for everything he doesnt bring, and enjoy his offense. We now have a denfensive minded pass first team with better ball movement.


Cant help but enjoy (or cringe) at Kanters offensive game in OKC though.
 
Very valid points. Which is why the trade worked for both ends. The Thunder can cover for everything he doesnt bring, and enjoy his offense. We now have a denfensive minded pass first team with better ball movement.


Cant help but enjoy (or cringe) at Kanters offensive game in OKC though.

27 and 12 is a man's work.
 
You don't draft a player at the third overall pick and treat him like a scrub.

I am sooo sick of hearing this. Like he should be given some special consideration because he was the third pick. Nothing is given. You get what you earn in this league. Rudy is a case in point.
 
Nothing is given. You get what you earn in this league.

I felt like josh howard was given his minutes with the jazz without earning them
 
Kanter + Gobert definitely could have worked. Kanter's a good player - and we did not get good value for him - but I think it boils down to the reality that he 100% would not have been here next season (unless we matched a massive contract for a player who did not want to play for us). So we get a 1st round pick for him. DL handled it the way I think any of us would have.
 
Too easy to say this just now...he had understandable reasons to not want to be here.

Jazz failed with his development and played cheap with him trying to hide his strong points and exposing his shortcomings in order to resign him at low price. They didn't put him in the ideal conditions to play his best basketball.
Yeah, the Jazz didn't have a Russell Westbrook on their team. Damn them.

Were there any other ideal conditions he needed? Does he suck that much? Good players create ideal conditions...in fact, they are ideal conditions.
 
Favors is a better offensive player than Kanter.....

Kanter is just really good at offensive rebounding. That is about the only thing he has on Favors.

LOL. Kanter has better post moves as well. It also helps that because of his offensive rebounding, you really don't have to call a play for Kanter.
 
Good for Kanter. Honestly.

Jazz got rid of him for the same reason they let Boozer go finally when his contract was up (and why Chicago also let him go, eventually). He defended for ****. Having a player like Kanter is a luxury. A one-way player only works if you have players like Westbrook and Durant and Ibaka.

Don't have players like that yet and need everyone to defend. And honestly as a fan how ****ty was it those years with Boozer, just knowing that everything he did offensively was undone on the other end of the court because he was such a candy-*** defender. Kanter sucks at D and is skilled around the hoop. And he sand bagged it because he was unhappy. Glad he's gone and glad he's having success. Seems like fun.
 
He looks really good. He's playing very relaxed and quite efficiently on the offensive end. Like all of a sudden he's more coordinated and skilled.
 
Kanter is an egomaniac, things are going well for him now cause' he just joined a playoff caliber team, contender when Durant is healthy. So it's back to Bull Kanter now. I'd like to see when things are on the down side... like if an upcoming star overwhelmingly threatens to take his position. Will he chicken out again?
 
It didn't work... It's already done and we got a 1st, early 2nd, great C/PF prospect, and a scrub. He was gone after this year so Lindsey did his job getting something in return.

Favors/Gobert is our front court of the future and are dominating so why play what if? What if we never got Favors? What if we took George vs Hayward? What if we took Paul instead?

Easy to say what if..... Let it go!
 

A1kecymCEAEdjCy.jpg
 

Attachments

  • A1kecymCEAEdjCy.jpg
    A1kecymCEAEdjCy.jpg
    79.8 KB · Views: 2
Top