mellow
Well-Known Member
Neither has Conley.
Too bad the thread won't be short.
Neither has Conley.
I cant wait to bump this stupid thread in 2 monthsNeither has Conley.
Too bad the thread won't be short.
No... that lineup is actually negative but small minutes... Conley for Ingles is good.Isn't Conley replacing Royce like the 5th best 5 man lineup in the league? That was done against better competition, no?
Kink shaming ain't cool manSome of y'all let the chick walk while you were daydreaming and now you're looking at a bunch of middle aged fat hairy men.
Having a good player that has played pretty bad replace another good player that is playing well in a lineup that is key to a pretty great stretch of wins is the concern... not just adding him to the rotation.Yeah... Adding another good player to a good team will hurt it... Especially one that is known as a positive locker room guy and a team player...
We are playing well without him during the easiest stretch of games we have this year.
Some of y’all are over simplifying the potential issue. We have multiple players in the starting lineup that are doing the things we want Conley to do... they are doing it at a much higher level than Mike was... those players also bring important things that Mike doesn’t. If Mike comes back and isn’t significantly improved over what he was earlier in the year we will be worse... we don’t get any “name brand” bonus points because it’s Mike Conley.
Maybe... even probably... but maybe he is declining or the system doesn’t fit... he’s been bad but when he was bad we didn’t have other good options... he will have to be really damn good to take possessions away from DM, Ingles, Bojan without costing us something.We can however reasonably expect Conley's next forty games to more closely resemble his previous couple of hundred games than his last twenty.
And the player he was in those last couple hundred games is absolutely a player than can help this team win more games.