What's new
By:

John Stockton Claims He Had Proof of 1000 Athletes Dying of Vaccine

What exactly do you think my point is I'm trying to prove?
 
Gameface said:
How could he give you a more reliable source for a quote that was obtained by Project Veritas? There is only one source.

So are you arguing in good faith? Demanding something that is obviously not possible.
Click to expand...
Absolutely. If a company and gov agencies didn’t know what the affects of mRNA vaccines were having on billions of people, there would be far more reporting on this than PV. There would be documents, reports from the government, whistleblowers, evidence, etc. Just like if PP and ACORN were doing the same evil deeds PV claimed they were doing in the past. The additional sources don’t exist because no such conspiracies exist.
 
Um, no, I simply googled the guy, then posted things from sources other than PV, NONE of which can verify the video. Then it opened up the door of the video might be fake. Any good cynic or simply thinking person will question the veracity of seemingly fantastic single-source "evidence". So then I found a really well-balanced snopes article where they just tried to find the guy and even admitted he might be who they say he is. Then I got curious and did my own search on LinkedIn. Found hundreds of execs at Pfizer, but not that guy. To be that casts doubt on the veracity of the evidence. Then take into account that PV is known for putting out evidence that has been trumped up or outright faked. All this together raises a reasonable doubt.

So can you or can you not provide any evidence at all the guy exists and is who they say he is? Habeas corpus, as it were. A simple yes or no will suffice. Or do you want to deflect some more?
 
You can't cgi? You can't have an actor play a role with a script? You can edit other videos together to make it say what you want? That isn't done literally every single day on the Internet? You are starting to sound more and more like some wild-eyed guy living under a bridge.
 
You need a couple of things here.

First, is that person who that person claimed to be on video or is claimed to be by PV?

Full unedited video from all sources they used, provided in a format that makes it as easy as possible to test for authenticity (deep fakes are a thing, if you don't know).

A response from the person, Jordan whoever he is, either denying the authenticity or explaining what he meant.

Let's keep in mind how this went down. PV sent a fake date to meet with someone who claims to be an executive at Pfizer. During the date the guy says all kinds of whack **** that mostly comes off as a brag or a "I know special stuff because I'm special." A tippity top executive at Pfizer is either a billionaire or very close to it. Making silly brags about **** like that seems odd to me.

Someone shown in a clipped video saying something like "...murdering babies is fun..." can look pretty bad. When you see the full video and see that the hidden camera wearing fake date started by saying "Did you hear about the death cult that literally murders babies and eats their pancreas before having wild sex orgies with goats?" and the "mark" responds with, "Oh that's disgusting, I hadn't heard about that. What's wrong with some people? I can't imagine someone who thinks, uh, you know... murdering babies is fun. They should be locked up ASAP!"

So keep talking about how they have it on video even though the entire unedited video has not been released.
 
I didn't fabricate anything. I googled one thing, his name. Then I posted the things I found. You can do the same thing. Please do in fact. Clear this all up by showing he's a real person and who they claim he is. Simple right? See I even tried that and got nothing. Can you? Do you even dare to try?
 
Keep it straight. You're talking to several different people. Don't put other people's arguments on me.
 
I honestly don't care if it's fake. I'm not afraid of Pfizer unleashing captain tripps on the world and destroying humanity. Have you read any of my posts? From an ethics standpoint they should be prosecuted if it's true, so we should try to prove it to be true, right? As with proving anything else you start with the original source. I did that and got nowhere. What did you find out about the guy when you googled him to thoroughly look into the claim, as i assume you didn't just see a video on your feed that got you mad so your immediately took it to be God's own truth, right?
 
PV has done **** like this before and it was either full on fake or very misleading. PV has never done anything with honor, dignity, integrity or honesty, so forgive me for being skeptical of their bombshells.
 
Wow man take a Valium or something. I think this is the single longest exchange I've ever had with you and if you feel I've attacked you I'm sorry. I'm trying to find validation of the video. I see you are heavily emotionally invested in this and I just am not so I'll just bow out. Sorry man.
 
No, an organizations reputation and history is not a conspiracy.

FULL UNEDITED VIDEO <-- keep ignoring that part
 
Just like Thriller asked you for something that is impossible to provide, you are doing that by demanding that we explain Pfizer's motivations. We don't know what Pfizer thinks, we can't. So we can't answer for why they do or do not make a specific public statement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top