john stockton speaks out against the covid policies
- Thread starter carey scurry fan
- Start date
I agree. It was not running through the population, just through the uninfected.
How do you know if a space laser is Jewish? Did they cut the tip of the laser off?
(PDF) How to Create Witty, Anti-Semitic Jokes: A Primer for Nitwits
PDF | This paper examines anti-Semitic humor, which, like most bigoted humor, is not very witty and often relies on ridiculous stereotypes. This is not... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
www.researchgate.net
You'll be OK. You still have Eurovision to look forward to... Oops, nevermind.
Your undeviating confidence in Establishment authority belies the fundamental problem of human nature, that "authority" is a sort of pack mentality where mightmakesright, them's that's got the gold make the rules, and most people are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.
Even your advocacy of racial issues is something most racial minorities (ormajorities) reject because those issues are directed at reinforcing authoritarian manipulations and controls over giveing anyone actual human rights.
Of course you sneer at any reference to Marx as having anything to do with today's politics, like every activist trained in political advocacy will do. But the whole idea of exploiting differences between people for political advantage was something he approved, as did many political manipulators across the ages before.
If you reject all claimed distinctions, and work from the idea that people are equal under the law, entitled to their problems and their opportunities, they are useless to the politicians.
So my thesis here is that scientists have also fallen under the sway of politics, as well as all authorit5arian institutions. When anyone in a discussion that degrades actual human rights of choice, like whether to get vaccinated or whether to have a party instead..... or whether to try any supposed remedy or not, or whether to just go lay down in the LA river and shoot yourself with fentanil, or get raped instead, the fundamental issue is not human welfare but Establishment Control.
Being willing to tear apart some half-wit's lame comments and tell the wold such idiots should have no right to speak just isn't going to do anything for the stupid people. And all it does for the Authorities is build a beautiful wall around the Estabnlishment Mansion.
I'm really tired of authoritarian science the way you cook it. Science is not something that validates Establishment, it is the right to question it.
Pretty sure you were not allowed to have a childhood.
Perhaps it would help if you did a remedial course of it.
This is not something that's exclusive in the herd...... uhhhmmmm...... in the human race.
A lot of people never question the first idea they get.
Almost no one will not defend any idea they like, even marginal ideas they hardly care about...... let alone the ones they've loved across thousands of hours of training or school.
In fact, it's always something of a barbarian who tries to shake you up a bit.
But the worst of the herd is the managers, perhaps a little more dogmatic than their upper managers, who are perhaps guided by scheming folks who know damn well what they're telling people is nonsense if not deliberate lies.
There are at least two critical differences between John Stockton speaking about public policy and health issues., and say a Joe Biden or CDC director.....
He doesn't claim to be an authority with jackbooted thugs enforcing his edicts.
He's just saying what he thinks, with a few items of supporting logic or supposed facts.
He violates no one's rights. He offers his thoughts free of charge. He has good will for people generally, and hopes more to help the public somehow.
Someone who comes into a chat discussion, or TV interview for that matter, unless he has some official position or reputation as specialist or respected opinion on the subject, is hardly a challenge to any "Established Consensus", but rather a good citizen participating in issues of the day.
I don't think there are ten people on planet earth who would consider his opinions "law".
So whether right or wrong, I still say good for John Stockton, and thank you.
He doesn't claim to be an authority with jackbooted thugs enforcing his edicts.
He's just saying what he thinks, with a few items of supporting logic or supposed facts.
He violates no one's rights. He offers his thoughts free of charge. He has good will for people generally, and hopes more to help the public somehow.
Someone who comes into a chat discussion, or TV interview for that matter, unless he has some official position or reputation as specialist or respected opinion on the subject, is hardly a challenge to any "Established Consensus", but rather a good citizen participating in issues of the day.
I don't think there are ten people on planet earth who would consider his opinions "law".
So whether right or wrong, I still say good for John Stockton, and thank you.
is non-existent. Your confusion of authority with evidence and knowledge is expected.
Also as conservatives do every election.
On the contrary, rejecting fantasy is the only basis for proceeding on reality.
It's both. Science doesn't give a rat's *** for establishment authority or for rebellion.
Sounds a lot like me. When's the last time you said "Good for One Brow"?
