I'm not a Giddey fan. I watched a lot of OKC this year, and he never impressed me. He always looked like the weak link on the court, and I wasn't even sure his passing was that special. I decided to look at his on/off stats just to see if maybe I was being biased against him, and I'm starting to think maybe I was.
Specifically the number that jumped out to me was that OKC averaged 4.66 more assists per 100 possessions when Giddey was on the court vs off the court. OKC's offense improved by 5.18pts/100 possessions when he was on the court. Now he did somewhat negate that with OKC giving up 3.6 more pts/100possessions when he was on the court.
As a Comparison this year here are other on/off assists and points per 100 possessions: Mike Conley + 2.6asts/+0.21pts, Tyrese Haliburton +2.25asts/+4.9pts, Luka -1.15asts/+9.56pts, Jokic +7.67ast/+16.62pts, Trae Young -0.84asts/+4.04pts, Lebron +7.86asts/+9.03pts.
To further understand these numbers I went back to Prime Joe Ingles in Utah where he was at +6.27asts/+2.43pts. I think Giddey could have a similar effect on our offense as Joe Ingles. Defensively, I disagree with the statement that he would improve our defense. Maybe it can't be any worse. I'm still a pass on trading for Giddey, but I could get behind it a little bit more after seeing how he could really change the way we play.