Jaymz
Well-Known Member
Interesting take.
I don’t know if slowing the game down would cause an immediate change in decline of injuries.
My first immediate thought would be a change in types of injuries.
A lot of elbows were thrown back in the day.
Also more games = more risk of injury
I think perhaps we are still looking at the issue through a microscope, and have tunnel vision. What if there are statistics linked to the injuries that we haven’t accounted for? Emotional states/ game importance/ rivalry, games
Also overuse injuries can be tricky. Too many what ifs involved.
The human body is really adaptive, and should adapt to whatever needs are being challenged.
So there is a fine balance to be met between endurance conditioning and overuse.
I don’t know if slowing the game down would cause an immediate change in decline of injuries.
My first immediate thought would be a change in types of injuries.
A lot of elbows were thrown back in the day.
Also more games = more risk of injury
I think perhaps we are still looking at the issue through a microscope, and have tunnel vision. What if there are statistics linked to the injuries that we haven’t accounted for? Emotional states/ game importance/ rivalry, games
Also overuse injuries can be tricky. Too many what ifs involved.
The human body is really adaptive, and should adapt to whatever needs are being challenged.
So there is a fine balance to be met between endurance conditioning and overuse.
Last edited:
