I never made a claim. Please post the claim I made. Remember, conjecture is not a claim of fact. You are doing a TON of projecting. It's kind of unreal. I'll just leave you to it. Go get'em!
John Stockton Claims He Had Proof of 1000 Athletes Dying of Vaccine
- Thread starter Saint Cy of JFC
- Start date
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
Then why doesn't pfizer quash this and say the guy doesn't exist? Answer the question... Why are you guys so afraid to answer a very simple question. This all goes away if they just come out and say this is fake. They don't though because they can't.
I don't think asking you to backup a flat out conspiracy is too much to ask. YOu guys made a claim that this guy is fake yet haven't provided one ounce of evidence. Not even an iota.
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
So you don't think it's fake? Or do you?
Asking to back up my position is not too much to ask. Specifying that I do it by providing information that is impossible for me to have is unreasonable.
I can't know what is in the mind of Pfizer. I do not have superpowers despite getting mRNA vaccines multiple times.
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
It's pretty obvious that if he didn't work there they would say so. I mean, c'mon guys this is pretty insanely stupid.
Yes you are insanely stupid since you haven't been able to comprehend what people are saying to you.
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
Lol you guys are fabricating a conspiracy that this Walker dude is fake and can't even back it up with anything other than a one sided Tucker Carlson hit piece that even admits they don't know. Please don't ever question my intelligence.
You can't even answer basic questions. You literally don't even know what you are pushing then point at me. You ever going to answer this basic question or not?
The Thriller
Well-Known Member
Did you not read post 384 yet or are you ignoring it?
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
How hard is this question?
If Walker was fake, why would Pfizer not just come out and say it?
You guys can't answer a simple basic question then expect me to answer yours. How about YOU answer my question I asked first? Thriller?
If Walker was fake, why would Pfizer not just come out and say it?
You guys can't answer a simple basic question then expect me to answer yours. How about YOU answer my question I asked first? Thriller?
I did. It had nothing to do with what I said. If you asked him for another source of Jordan Walker saying that stuff then you were asking for the impossible.
I'm on the verge of putting you on ignore. I'll stop addressing you directly.
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
Just an example that Pfizer doesn't give a **** about any of you. Hell Walker(a guy who doesn't exist apparently lololol)even admits it's all just a "cash cow". It's right in front of peoples faces and they continue to fight for them. They won't even address very basic concerns.
news.bloomberglaw.com
Pfizer to Pay $345 Million to Exit EpiPen Price-Gouging Case (3)
Pfizer to Pay $345 Million to Exit EpiPen Price-Gouging Case (3)
Pfizer Inc. and two subsidiaries will pay $345 million to escape antitrust litigation over an alleged scheme to gouge purchasers of the EpiPen, a lifesaving allergy treatment formerly made by a Pfizer unit and marketed by Mylan NV, according to a federal court filing in Kansas.
The Thriller
Well-Known Member
Wait a second game, let’s talk about this rationally:
1. Throughout this thread Steak’s position has been that “Big Pharm” has been doing humanity harm for profit. That context matters.
2. Steak now cites a video produced by PV with supposed Pfizer employees admitting the pt above.
3. I ask in post 360:
4. And I’m the one being absurd here? I’m asking for more reliable information that Pfizer is willingly doing harm for profit than a doctored up video from PV. That’s not asking to prove a negative. That’s actually asking one to provide evidence to support the claim Steak has made multiple times.
I don’t know what’s gone on with you but you’ve seemed to become increasingly hostile to me lately. Almost weekly you seem to argue for the sake of arguing. Not sure why. And honestly, if this is how you’re going to act, put me on ignore, please. It’ll save us all a lot of time.
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
Pfizer Accused of 'Obscene' COVID Profits After Posting Record Revenues
Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer has been accused of making an "obscene profit" from the coronavirus pandemic after it posted record revenue of more than $100 billion for 2022, a rise of 23 percent on the previous year.
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
Personally I thought it was basic knowledge that the vaccine has had adverse effects on womans reproduction. I understand Thriller being ignorant of the idea as he is all on serving his God Pfizer and with how much bigotry and hate he spews there's no turning back but this is common knowledge that there has been issues.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Truth about 'Pfertility': Covid vaccines CAN disrupt menstrual cycles
Project Veritas revealed a second video from its Pfizer sting operation Thursday. Despite claims in the video, there is little evidence the vaccine impacts fertility.
Red
Well-Known Member
I do t know who the guy is. Maybe he is exactly who he said he was. But, whoever he is, shouldn’t we at least post the follow up video? I do suspect the whole thing will be seen as more BS by Project Veritas, in the long run. JMO. It’s also nobody’s responsibility in this forum to prove or disprove whether he is who he identified himself to be. As to the why Pfizer does not simply deny his claimed title, no forum member is required to answer that question at all, since any answer could only be speculation. We cannot have the answer with any certainty at all. Why the hell are we responsible for answering for Pfizer? And why can we not point out the questionable reputation of Project Vetitas, without being accused of conspiracism? If Project Veritas is involved, their reputation is relevant, regardless of the veracity of the claims made. And pointing their reputation out is not the equivalent of 100% disproving the interviewed man’s claims.
www.themainewire.com
View: https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1618737936920633344
Pfizer Director of Research Freaks Out After Spilling Virus Secrets in 2nd Project Veritas Undercover Video - The Maine Wire
Undercover video released by Project Veritas on Wednesday showed a high-level employee at pharmaceutical giant Pfizer spilling company secrets. Now, a second video shows how that employee reacted when Project Veritas’ James O’Keefe confronted him about the content of the secret recording. In the...
www.themainewire.com
View: https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1618737936920633344
Last edited:
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
I do t know who the guy is. Maybe he is exactly who he said he was. But, whoever he is, shouldn’t we at least post the follow up video? I do suspect the whole thing will be seen as more BS by Project Veritas, in the long run. JMO. It’s also nobody’s responsibility in this forum to prove or disprove whether he is who he identified himself to be. As to the why Pfizer does not simply deny his claimed title, no forum member is required to answer that question at all, since any answer could only be speculation. We cannot have the answer with any certainty at all. Why the hell are we responsible for answering for Pfizer? And why can we not point out the questionable reputation of Project Vetitas, without being accused of conspiracism? If Project Veritas is involved, their reputation is relevant, regardless of the veracity of the claims made. And pointing their reputation out is not the equivalent of 100% disproving the interviewed man’s claims.
Pfizer Director of Research Freaks Out After Spilling Virus Secrets in 2nd Project Veritas Undercover Video - The Maine Wire
Undercover video released by Project Veritas on Wednesday showed a high-level employee at pharmaceutical giant Pfizer spilling company secrets. Now, a second video shows how that employee reacted when Project Veritas’ James O’Keefe confronted him about the content of the secret recording. In the...
View: https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1618737936920633344
So in other words, make up baseless conspiracies and you shouldn't be responsible for backing up baseless claims. That's admirable...(sarcasm)
I never said it's wrong to question Project Veritas but at least provide evidence. There is literally this guy on camera admitting that the vaccine can be dangerous. That is pretty sufficient evidence unlike an opinion piece. If this guy was CGI'd like people here claim(I'm being facetios) then Pfizer would say so. This is common sense. You guys cannot refute anything. The only thing you guys have done is attack PV not try to disprove it. Because you can't. ANd by you, I don't mean you specifically Red I mean the guys I that have nothing but conspiracies.
One Brow
Well-Known Member
Well, duh. Any time you take a medicine with an effect, there are possible, unknown side effects. Until you find actual side effects, you're just scare-mongering, and highly ineffectively.
One Brow
Well-Known Member
When people say you treat all conservative posters the same and that it is unfair, this is a good example of what we are talking about. I don't think anyone has a problem with you criticizing @SteakNEggs in this thread.
One Brow
Well-Known Member
What does Pfizer have to gain by responding to Project Veritas?
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
It's not PV they are failing to respond to, it's the multiple new main stream news sources asking about it. Here's Reds article stating the same. If he was not an employee they would say so to nip this all in the bud, but they simply can't. You really think this negative publicity is good for the company? They gain a lot actually. They could stop this entire story but they simply can't.
"Pfizer has not responded publicly to the video despite repeated attempts by various media outlets to get them talking."