The Fresh Prince
Well-Known Member
Im suprised CJ hasnt seen this thread yet.
Hey, but isnt CAROLINA's ole lady black? I thought he once said that.
Hey, but isnt CAROLINA's ole lady black? I thought he once said that.
CarolinaJazz
- Thread starter Hantlers
- Start date
The Fresh Prince
Well-Known Member
Hey, and wasnt Ugli the one that found the streetball gif he had on the old site for him?
He has said that multiple times. Pretty sure she is the one discussed in a thread who is ashamed of her black cuture and lives the white lifestyle, but yeah, black skin so he says.
UGLI baby
Well-Known Member
You gots the wrong guy.
You can buy into racist ideas without being hateful, or even thinking those traits racially attributed are desirable.
And I've certainly never trolled a dumbass into getting an infraction here.
hahaha
Hantlers
Well-Known Member
Touché. However I do believe that is a personal attack, which is against the rules.
Reported.
Ignored.
If you believe that we've never given CJ infractions for his post content then you believe incorrectly. I'm sure that if you ask him he'll tell you all about the time he got an infraction for using the phrase "cotton picking" in a particular way. We all know what the CJ persona is and everyone takes it about as seriously as they should. He's no where near as bad in terms of omnipresence as, say, in 2004.
The JF moderating system, by design, makes it almost impossible to get banned. You almost have to try, post repeatedly while drunk and ignorant of the potential consequences, and/or be so obnoxious that someone will work really hard to find the five worst and most disruptive things that you do over a six month period. Even those that meet those high hurdles tend to get let back in at some point if they're nice about it and appeal to Jason's soft underbelly. Let's be clear: despite all the bitching and moaning that gets done about moderation, most of you like it that way. No one wants us to actively witch hunt trolling because all the most popular members of the board would be on red alert. No one wants us to infract PKM for playing with bbcode username tags and causing mass confusion. No one wants us to hunt down the UGLI group's inside jokes. For the most part you want to be left alone and that's what we do. We hand out, on average, maybe 5-10 infractions per month across all the users and then spend lots of digital ink dealing with people who publicly complain about it.
In short, Hantlers, you don't want to be judged by the standards you want us to hold CJ to. That's not the board you want to post on.
The JF moderating system, by design, makes it almost impossible to get banned. You almost have to try, post repeatedly while drunk and ignorant of the potential consequences, and/or be so obnoxious that someone will work really hard to find the five worst and most disruptive things that you do over a six month period. Even those that meet those high hurdles tend to get let back in at some point if they're nice about it and appeal to Jason's soft underbelly. Let's be clear: despite all the bitching and moaning that gets done about moderation, most of you like it that way. No one wants us to actively witch hunt trolling because all the most popular members of the board would be on red alert. No one wants us to infract PKM for playing with bbcode username tags and causing mass confusion. No one wants us to hunt down the UGLI group's inside jokes. For the most part you want to be left alone and that's what we do. We hand out, on average, maybe 5-10 infractions per month across all the users and then spend lots of digital ink dealing with people who publicly complain about it.
In short, Hantlers, you don't want to be judged by the standards you want us to hold CJ to. That's not the board you want to post on.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Try to get banned? Like the time kickysmalls power banned honz and I in like two seconds for joking around about being in a roommate fight? SMFH.
"Banned" is different than "suspended".