What's new

Never Trump

ZRGxT8QKj6-4.png
 
American party politics are organized interventions dedicated to preventing people from having any choice, really. Talk about exclusive clubs and manipulative rhetoric.

Trump is riding a substantial wave of resentment and rejection of both parties, because people think he's something different from the traditional CFR club offerings. But he is not. He's just an easily caricaturized symbol of "something different" who's being worked into a symbol that will stand to make a new generation of Hillaries, Bills, and Bushes seem good.

I expect Hillary's daughter Chelsea to be our President by 2030.

Well, unless we sack Foggy Bottom and really throw the bums out.

And. . . . Hell yeah. . . . if you don't vote for Chelsea then, she'll call you a racist and a bigot too.
 
Most people know about Trump University, the bait and switch scam Trump set up to rip off elderly and uneducated folks hoping to get rich from real estate, where “tuition” could be as much as $35,000 for a few three-day seminars offering stale late-night infomercial advice.

Most people also know Trump is being sued by Attorneys General from around the country, including New York and California, for fraud.

Now, new information is coming to light on how and why Florida decided not to join in the civil lawsuits against Trump University.

Brief background: back in 2013, Pam Bondi, Florida Attorney General, personally asked Trump for a political contribution at the same time she was making the Trump University decision; shortly thereafter a $25,000 donation from Trump was sent to her reelection campaign; after receiving the donation Bondi announced Florida would not be suing Trump.

Those are the facts. What we need is an investigation to determine if there was quid pro quo by Trump and whether Bondi violated Florida ethics law by requesting and accepting a donation from an individual under investigation by her office. Sadly, any investigation will take months, with the results unknown until well after the election.
 
Most people know about Trump University, the bait and switch scam Trump set up to rip off elderly and uneducated folks hoping to get rich from real estate, where “tuition” could be as much as $35,000 for a few three-day seminars offering stale late-night infomercial advice.

Most people also know Trump is being sued by Attorneys General from around the country, including New York and California, for fraud.

Now, new information is coming to light on how and why Florida decided not to join in the civil lawsuits against Trump University.

Brief background: back in 2013, Pam Bondi, Florida Attorney General, personally asked Trump for a political contribution at the same time she was making the Trump University decision; shortly thereafter a $25,000 donation from Trump was sent to her reelection campaign; after receiving the donation Bondi announced Florida would not be suing Trump.

Those are the facts. What we need is an investigation to determine if there was quid pro quo by Trump and whether Bondi violated Florida ethics law by requesting and accepting a donation from an individual under investigation by her office. Sadly, any investigation will take months, with the results unknown until well after the election.

What's your point?
Everybody already #nevertrumps and everybody already #neverhillarys for largely the same reasons.

But thanks for shedding additional light on the we-have-a-****ty-choice-to-make decision before us.
 
I think the even more remarkable thing is that conditions have become ripe for a Hillary Clinton presidency. If you took the facts from her email case and put a different name on the file I have no doubt that the vast majority of the people who are currently defending and/or voting for this person would instead believe that this person belongs in prison.

Did you see the notes released yesterday from her FBI interview? She repeatedly claimed that she was unaware of the rules regarding her email, even though she had signed several documents verifying that she was. If not for her political power they would have thrown the book at her.

Let me just say that I absolutely ignore anything you say about Hillary Clinton. It's a constant mission to prove that she is the dirtiest presidential candidate the world has ever seen. I see in you a culmination of everything the Republicans have been attempting for the last twenty five years (I'm an independent by the way), not to mention Julian Assange's sole purpose in life to drag Clinton's name through the dirt and screw with the most important election in the world. Almost everything you say about her is irrelevant or taken out of context or without knowing the details of the whole situation. If you had any balance at all, your one-sided tirade might actually be more effective.
 
Back
Top