I follow the blog of a former government security IT tech (stderr, by Marcus Ranum) who discusses this sort of stuff frequently.
And how do you assess the objectivity of this source? How do you check the facts, or allegations?
This supports my point. There is too much data, and they can't respond to it all.
yah, I drive by the Utah data aggregation center sometimes. The location of this monster has started a tech landslide on the other side of the Jordan River, and oh 4 new East-West highways to connect the system. Silicon Valley has a Utah competitor, Silicon Slopes, Whatever the hell was on Hillary's server is stored there as well. If we cared, or dared, to actually get the relevant facts out for the public, it's all there. And it's minable, like with block technology and stuff. You can go to the source. You can amass any set of data you want, with a search request and parameters to suit the case. But my point was that there was a leak to the news media about a specific FBI report that was handed out to the Capitol police, which is to say to the management top dogs of the Capitol police, most likely directly to the chief officer of the day, and probably also available to Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell. The report was not concerning known Trump loyalists or Trump himself, but leftwing activists. That makes the entire Trump allegation a damned lie. But we'll never have that case made in our Press. The New York Times and Washington Post, which had the leaked material, have gone into embarrassed mumms about that part of the report.